Impression Management in Public Sector Audit Proposals: Language and Fees

Yu-Tzu Chang and Dan N. Stone

European Accounting Review, 2023, vol. 32, issue 2, 311-343

Abstract: We adapt impression management theory to investigate: (1) whether governmental audit proposals include the values of ‘professionalism’ (i.e. independence and competence) and ‘commercialism’ (i.e. client cooperation, auditor trustworthiness, client satisfaction, commercial interests), and, (2) the relations of audit proposal language and contextual influences on proposed audit fees and proposal success. The results suggest that proposals accord with audit firms’ market strategies. Compared to other firms, proposals from small, non-specialist firms use more commercial language, while proposals from governmental specialist firms use more competence language. The results also suggest that the market for US public sector audits includes many low cost, low quality firms; specifically, the modal proposal (41.2%) includes high use of commercialism language and low proposed audit fees. We also find that audit firms propose higher audit fees in US states with a weak governmental internal auditing office, and, that greater use of commercial language correlates with higher rates of proposal success, but only in US states with weak governmental internal auditing functions. The finding of inter-relations between proposal language, the strength of governmental internal audit functions, and proposed fees suggests the value of considering multiple influences on the quality of the public sector financial controls.Acronyms : American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) ; Certified Public Accountant (CPA) ; Corporate social responsibility (CSR) ; European Court of Auditors (ECA) ; European Union (EU) ; fixed effects (FE) ; General Accountability Office (GAO) ; Governmental Financial Officers Association (GFOA) ; Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors (IRBA) ; Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) ; International Accounting Education Standards Board (IAESB) ; International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) ; International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) ; National Association of State Auditors ; Comptrollers and Treasurers (NASACT) ; not-for-profit (NFP) entities ; natural language processing (NLP) ; Office of Management and Budget (OMB) ; Request for proposal (RFP) ; Two-stage least squares (2SLS) ; United Kingdom (UK) ; United States (US)

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2021.1969260 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:euract:v:32:y:2023:i:2:p:311-343

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20

DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2021.1969260

Access Statistics for this article

European Accounting Review is currently edited by Laurence van Lent

More articles in European Accounting Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().