Users' perceptions of the need for cash flow statements — Australian evidence
Christine Yap
European Accounting Review, 1997, vol. 6, issue 4, 653-672
Abstract:
Professional accounting bodies have endorsed claims of the need for cash flow information through their issuance of Standards on cash flow statements. Few empirical studies have tested the extent to which decision-makers actually use cash flow information. Whilst market-based studies have tested the reaction of the stock market to the release of cash flow information, they have not established the usefulness of cash flow information to financial statement users. Such a study is important not just for the signals it gives to regulators, but also by virtue of the importance those signals have for the preparers of accounting information. The academic and professional literature, identify four possible contributing factors of demand for cash flow information: (i) the limitations of conventional accrual accounting, (ii) dissatisfaction with the funds statement, (iii) relevance for users' decisions, and (iv) changes in the reporting environment. To determine the extent to which investors and creditors agreed with these factors in favour of publishing cash flow data, a survey was conducted of workers in the finance industry in Australia. The results support the claims made in the academic and professional literature as to the need for cash flow information. Cash flow statements have become important sources of information for users. They have not, however, replaced the conventional income statement and balance sheet. All three financial statements are considered to be complementary.
Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638189700000006 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:euract:v:6:y:1997:i:4:p:653-672
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20
DOI: 10.1080/09638189700000006
Access Statistics for this article
European Accounting Review is currently edited by Laurence van Lent
More articles in European Accounting Review from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().