Short-selling constraints and ‘quantitative’ investment strategies
Panagiotis Andrikopoulos (),
James Clunie and
The European Journal of Finance, 2013, vol. 19, issue 1, 19-35
This study uses stock lending data from Data Explorers to assess the impact of short-selling constraints on the profitability of eight investment strategies. Returns from unconstrained long--short portfolios are compared with those from ‘feasible’ portfolios, constrained to short-selling only those shares that can be borrowed. We find that only a small percentage of the firms identified by Datastream for short-selling are available for lending, but our results suggest that differences in profitability between unconstrained and feasible strategies are statistically insignificant. We also find that the stock borrowing fee for the majority of the strategies is normally less than 1% per annum, showing that prior UK studies, which assumed that the short-selling fee is flat at 1.50% per annum, have overestimated such cost. Overall, these results indicate that stock loan unavailability and stock borrowing fees do not explain the persistence of returns from anomaly-exploiting quantitative investment strategies in the UK stock market.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:19:y:2013:i:1:p:19-35
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
The European Journal of Finance is currently edited by Chris Adcock
More articles in The European Journal of Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Series data maintained by Chris Longhurst ().