Measuring Women's Autonomy in Chad Using the Relative Autonomy Index
Ana Vaz,
Pierre Pratley and
Sabina Alkire
Feminist Economics, 2016, vol. 22, issue 1, 264-294
Abstract:
Increasing women's voice and agency is widely recognized as a key strategy to reduce gender inequalities and improve health outcomes. Although recent studies have found associations between women's autonomy and a number of health outcomes, fundamental issues regarding adequate measurement of women's autonomy remain. The Relative Autonomy Index (RAI) provides a direct measure of motivational autonomy. It expresses the extent to which a woman faces coercive or internalized social pressure to undertake domain-specific actions. This contribution addresses a key critique of current measures of autonomy, which focus on decision making or ignore women's values. This study examines the measurement properties and added value of a number of domain-specific RAIs using new nationally representative data from the Republic of Chad. A striking finding is that women on average have less autonomous motivation in all eight domains compared to their male counterparts.
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2015.1108991 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:femeco:v:22:y:2016:i:1:p:264-294
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RFEC20
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2015.1108991
Access Statistics for this article
Feminist Economics is currently edited by Diana Strassmann
More articles in Feminist Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().