Sex Work and Trafficking: Moving beyond Dichotomies
Francesca Bettio,
Marina Della Giusta () and
Maria Laura Di Tommaso
Feminist Economics, 2017, vol. 23, issue 3, 1-22
Abstract:
This contribution examines how feminist economists have conceptualized sex work and trafficking through the lens of agency and stigma. The ongoing debate about legalization has focused on sex workers’ agency and choice, and on the role of stigma in shaping the supply of and demand for sex work. Building on the analysis advanced by contributions to this special issue, this study contends that theoretical and policy debates about sex work are dominated by false dichotomies of agency and stigma. It argues that the relationship between stigma and agency operates along a continuum of contractual arrangements that underpins a high degree of segmentation in the industry. The higher the stigma, the lower tends to be the agency. Current policies toward sex work therefore need reconsideration – especially mounting support for criminalization of clients, which, by increasing stigma, is likely to detract from the agency and the well-being of sex workers, however unintentionally.
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13545701.2017.1330547 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:femeco:v:23:y:2017:i:3:p:1-22
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RFEC20
DOI: 10.1080/13545701.2017.1330547
Access Statistics for this article
Feminist Economics is currently edited by Diana Strassmann
More articles in Feminist Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().