Cutback management in Canadian cities

Robert Heuton and John Strate

Local Government Studies, 2020, vol. 46, issue 2, 253-277

Abstract: This study looks at the views of municipal managers in Canada about cutback management, using data from a national survey conducted in two waves: 2009 and 2015. The first period reflects the onset of the Great Recession, and the second its aftermath. We argue that the choice of cutback management strategies and tools in Canadian cities is driven by two concerns: taking actions that can be justified and avoiding losses in services. Other considerations include easy to use tools, having council support, and employing New Public Management practices. Municipal managers view increases in taxes and user fees to be very important. Improving in-house management practices are also very important. Targeted cuts, such as cuts to capital expenditures, are somewhat important. Cuts to human resources that involve large losses for employees and likely service reductions, are less important. Changes to the city's mission that reduce services and programmes are unimportant.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03003930.2019.1654999 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:flgsxx:v:46:y:2020:i:2:p:253-277

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/flgs20

DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2019.1654999

Access Statistics for this article

Local Government Studies is currently edited by Helen Hancock

More articles in Local Government Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().