Whatever Inconsistencies and Effects? Explaining the Resilience of the Policy Reforms Applied to Developing Countries

Alice Sindzingre

Forum for Social Economics, 2015, vol. 44, issue 2, 159-178

Abstract: Why is 'neoliberalism' still a predominant framework within economics and policy-making? This paper considers the mix of theoretical assumptions, causalities and policies known as the 'Washington consensus', focusing on developing countries. First, it analyses their main elements, resilience and effects (the 'lost decades in spite of policy reform'). Second, it examines the reasons of this resilience and argues that a reason is their adaptive capacity via constant exchanges between facts and conceptual assumptions, because this mix is constituted of heterogeneous elements (from neoclassical theory, ad hoc models or empirics-based policy-making): inconsistency is a core feature and as such its correction is irrelevant. These 'adaptive inconsistencies' are consolidated by the simultaneous theoretical/policy dimension of the mix. Its cognitive resilience is reinforced by the irrefutability of causations and the cause/effect time lag ('after current costs, there will be gains', e.g. growth), and is not challenged by the social costs of policies.

Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07360932.2014.951378 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Whatever Inconsistencies and Effects? Explaining the Resilience of the Policy Reforms Applied to Developing Countries (2015)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:fosoec:v:44:y:2015:i:2:p:159-178

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RFSE20

DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2014.951378

Access Statistics for this article

Forum for Social Economics is currently edited by William Milberg, Dr Wolfram Elsner, Philip O'Hara, Cecilia Winters and Paolo Ramazzotti

More articles in Forum for Social Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().