Consistency of choice in nonparametric multiple comparisons
Mark Fey and
Kevin Clarke
Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 2012, vol. 24, issue 2, 531-541
Abstract:
In this paper, we are interested in the inconsistencies that can arise in the context of rank-based multiple comparisons. It is well known that these inconsistencies exist, but we prove that every possible distribution-free rank-based multiple comparison procedure with certain reasonable properties is susceptible to these phenomena. The proof is based on a generalisation of Arrow's theorem, a fundamental result in social choice theory which states that when faced with three or more alternatives, it is impossible to rationally aggregate preference rankings subject to certain desirable properties. Applying this theorem to treatment rankings, we generalise a number of existing results in the literature and demonstrate that procedures that use rank sums cannot be improved. Finally, we show that the best possible procedures are based on the Friedman rank statistic and the k-sample sign statistic, in that these statistics minimise the potential for paradoxical results.
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485252.2012.675436 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:24:y:2012:i:2:p:531-541
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/GNST20
DOI: 10.1080/10485252.2012.675436
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Nonparametric Statistics is currently edited by Jun Shao
More articles in Journal of Nonparametric Statistics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().