Improved Mutual Fund Investment Choice Architecture

Philip W. S. Newall and Katie N. Parker

Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2019, vol. 20, issue 1, 96-106

Abstract: Two choice architecture interventions were explored to debias investors' irrational preference for mutual funds with high past returns rather than funds with low fees. A simple choice task was used involving a direct trade-off between maximizing past returns and minimizing fees. In the first intervention, warning investors that “Some people invest based on past performance, but funds with low fees have the highest future results” was more effective than 3 other disclosure statements, including the U.S. financial regulator's, “Past performance does not guarantee future results.” The second intervention involved converting mutual fund annual percentage fees into a 10-year dollar cost equivalent. This intervention also improved investors' fee sensitivity, and remained effective even as past returns increased. Financially literate participants were surprisingly more likely to irrationally maximize past returns in their investment choices.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2018.1464455 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:96-106

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/hbhf20

DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2018.1464455

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral Finance is currently edited by Brian Bruce

More articles in Journal of Behavioral Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().