Are Markets Efficient? A Quantum Mechanics View
Evangelos Vasileiou
Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2021, vol. 22, issue 2, 214-220
Abstract:
In this paper we adopt some ideas from Quantum mechanics, and particularly the well-known Schrödinger’s cat (1935) thought experiment in order to present some new views on the big question whether the markets are efficient or not. There are two main conflicting approaches in financial economics: the behavioral approach and the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH). The behavioral approach usually uses psychological theories in order to explain what the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) cannot. However, behavioral finance does not have a specific model to suggest, and this is one major counterargument put forth by EMH supporters. Using the well-known CUBA fund case as an example, we show that EMH seems to be in superposition (simultaneously correct and incorrect), but suddenly collapses into one configuration. These dominant economics approaches are supplementary, so it is better for scholars that support either the EMH or behavioral finance to incorporate their ideas into one model, than to continue debating the accuracy of the EMH. The Quantum approach enables us to distinguish the unexpectable from the irrational. Adopting the quantum way of thinking we can build more accurate models and work toward the goal that most scholars pursue: to understand how the world works.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2020.1772260 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:22:y:2021:i:2:p:214-220
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/hbhf20
DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2020.1772260
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Behavioral Finance is currently edited by Brian Bruce
More articles in Journal of Behavioral Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().