Confirmation Bias in Analysts’ Response to Consensus Forecasts

Huan Cai, Tong Yao and Xiaodi Zhang

Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2024, vol. 25, issue 3, 334-355

Abstract: This paper provides evidence of confirmation bias by sell-side analysts in their earnings forecasts. We show that analysts tend to put higher weight on public information when the current forecast consensus is more consistent with their previous forecasts. We further find that analysts with better past forecasting performance, longer firm-specific experience, or forecasting earlier, tend to be more subject to confirmation bias, consistent with some of the existing cognitive and social psychology theories. The results remain significant after controlling for analyst incentives. Finally, we distinguish evidence of confirmation bias from that of other important behavioral biases such as conservative bias.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15427560.2022.2138395 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:hbhfxx:v:25:y:2024:i:3:p:334-355

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/hbhf20

DOI: 10.1080/15427560.2022.2138395

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Behavioral Finance is currently edited by Brian Bruce

More articles in Journal of Behavioral Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().