Comment on Shishir Mathur's “do impact fees raise the price of existing housing?”

Timothy S. Chapín

Housing Policy Debate, 2007, vol. 18, issue 4, 661-667

Abstract: Mathur finds that impact fees have different effects on affordability for “low‐quality” and “high‐quality” units. His study indicates that such fees increase prices for existing high‐quality homes, but not for existing low‐quality homes. He concludes that this finding is good news for those who support impact fees, because it would suggest that they do not affect affordability in lower‐income neighborhoods. In offering a different view, I first discuss the intent of impact fees and illustrate that certain types of fees should raise prices for low‐quality housing, regardless of whether it is new or existing. Noting that not all impact fees are created equal, I also suggest a key refinement for future research to explore this aspect. Finally, I identify different types of fees and describe two scenarios in which the price effects would be expected to differ from those Mathur describes.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2007.9521616 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:18:y:2007:i:4:p:661-667

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20

DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2007.9521616

Access Statistics for this article

Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra

More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().