Are low-income housing tax credit developments locating where there is a shortage of affordable units?
Kirk McClure
Housing Policy Debate, 2010, vol. 20, issue 2, 153-171
Abstract:
Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) developments serve renter households with incomes between 30% and 60% of Area Median Family Income. Ideally, the program places units into neighborhoods where there is a shortage of units serving this cohort. LIHTC units are allocated to developers by state agencies through their Qualified Allocation Plans which should direct units to areas of need. Using a national database, this research examines where LIHTC developments were placed in service to determine whether these developments enter tracts experiencing shortages. The LIHTC program is not directing units to those census tracts where there is a latent demand for units in this rent range. Rather, it is placing units into tracts that have surpluses. Equally, the program is not placing units in tracts with little or no affordable housing. This suggests that the program is not breaking down the income separation that exists in the nation's housing markets.
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511481003738260 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:20:y:2010:i:2:p:153-171
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20
DOI: 10.1080/10511481003738260
Access Statistics for this article
Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra
More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().