Foreclosures and Metropolitan Spatial Structure: Establishing the Connection
Selma Hepp
Housing Policy Debate, 2013, vol. 23, issue 3, 497-520
Abstract:
This article explores the link between foreclosures and costs of commuting. For metropolitan spatial form, the important question on spatial location of foreclosures is whether their concentration in suburbia stems from higher risk lending during the subprime boom alone or whether costs of commuting added additional risk because of their stress on household budgets. The analysis attempts to single out the impact of proximity to the central business districts and transit and employment accessibility in accumulation of distressed properties in Maryland, and the Washington and Baltimore metropolitan areas separately. The analysis shows that even after accounting for subprime lending and employment, distance to the central business district impacted levels of distressed properties, particularly in the Washington region. There were more foreclosures farther from the urban core and in areas with relatively lesser access to employment.
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2013.771787 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:23:y:2013:i:3:p:497-520
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2013.771787
Access Statistics for this article
Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra
More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().