Using Community Development Block Grant Dollars to Revitalize Neighborhoods: The Impact of Program Spending in Philadelphia

Karen Beck Pooley

Housing Policy Debate, 2014, vol. 24, issue 1, 172-191

Abstract: Since the 1930s, federal housing policy has pursued an array of goals: addressing housing quality and affordability, neighborhood conditions, and residential segregation; and seeking to increase local employment opportunities and cities' tax bases. While the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program, established in 1974 to replace a number of categorical grants, was designed to be flexible and broad enough to include all of these goals, in most cases, local decision makers have focused program dollars on improving housing, not neighborhood-wide, conditions.Public community development and housing programs can play a central role in prompting positive neighborhood change and ultimately repositioning weaker neighborhoods. There is a growing consensus in the literature that subsidized housing investments are more likely to generate such spillover effects if they are geographically targeted. What is less well known is exactly how much spending is required-what the threshold amount is-to positively impact neighborhood-wide conditions and values.This project tests recent estimates of threshold spending amounts using data on investments funded by Philadelphia's Community Development Block Grants and Section 108 loans, and house value trends at the census-tract level. According to this analysis, Philadelphia census tracts receiving above-sample-median amounts of CDBG and/or Section 108 loan funds saw property values increase far more than those tracts receiving less subsidy or control group tracts receiving no subsidy at all. This suggests that geographically targeting subsidies can help maximize their neighborhood-wide effects.

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2013.851100 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:24:y:2014:i:1:p:172-191

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20

DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2013.851100

Access Statistics for this article

Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra

More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().