Housing Choice Under Borrowing Constraints

Kevin A. Park

Housing Policy Debate, 2021, vol. 31, issue 2, 342-372

Abstract: A dramatic decline in the maximum loan amount eligible for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgage insurance in the Salt Lake City, Utah, metropolitan statistical area between 2013 and 2014 provides a natural experiment in the impact of borrowing constraints on housing decisions. Using a difference-in-differences design within a seemingly unrelated regression model, we estimate the impact of this constraint on the size and location of homes purchased by FHA borrowers. We find that borrowers likely constrained by the new loan limits purchased smaller homes with larger downpayments than similar borrowers prior to the loan limit decline. Likely constrained borrowers do not appear to compromise on location, including the quality of local schools. The net effect of the housing choices compelled by the reduction in loan limits does not appear to change the credit risk of borrowers.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2020.1815069 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:31:y:2021:i:2:p:342-372

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20

DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2020.1815069

Access Statistics for this article

Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra

More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().