Inaccuracies in Eviction Records: Implications for Renters and Researchers
Adam Porton,
Ashley Gromis and
Matthew Desmond
Housing Policy Debate, 2021, vol. 31, issue 3-5, 377-394
Abstract:
Administrative court records are increasingly used to study the prevalence of eviction. Yet inaccuracies in court records bias estimates of eviction and distort tenants’ true rental histories. This is the first study to systematically assess the prevalence of inaccuracies across jurisdictions. Drawing on over 3.6 million administrative eviction court records from 12 states, we find that, on average, 22% of eviction records contain ambiguous information on how the case was resolved or falsely represent a tenant’s eviction history. Adjusting for multiple inaccuracies in the data produces significantly different eviction rate estimates. Cases with increased complexity, such as those involving multiple tenants and lawyers, are more likely to contain inaccuracies. However, inaccuracies vary most prominently between states, indicating that state court system characteristics fundamentally shape the official record of the evicted population.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2020.1748084 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:31:y:2021:i:3-5:p:377-394
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20
DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2020.1748084
Access Statistics for this article
Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra
More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().