Can Economic Fact-Checking Remedy Incorrect Beliefs About Housing Markets?

Clayton Nall

Housing Policy Debate, 2025, vol. 35, issue 1, 118-123

Abstract: Supply skepticism is the widely held belief that building more market-rate housing does not help reduce housing prices. Why is supply skepticism a problem, and what is likely to be publicly engaged scholars’ best approach to correcting it? Been et al. have been the leading scholars bringing attention to the phenomenon, and have compiled new economic evidence that increasingly demonstrates that market-rate housing construction reduces housing prices. Will the skeptics who deny the operation of supply and demand in housing markets be persuaded? This seems unlikely. Engaged policy elites who question the benefit of additional housing supply already have well-formed views that are unlikely to be converted by recent, incremental discoveries about housing supply’s price effects. At first glance, the lay public also appears to be supply-skeptical, but their beliefs are only weakly held and unstable. Instead of clear beliefs about markets (skeptical or otherwise), people hold “folk-economic” views that personalize market interactions and blame “bad actors” for high housing prices. They support state housing policies that would punish putative bad actors (e.g., developers, landlords, and Wall Street investors) while showing only tepid and unstable support for building additional market-rate housing. The silver lining for pro-supply advocates is that the average voter’s poorly formed views about housing markets might be susceptible to education and persuasion campaigns that can effectively simplify current research findings.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10511482.2024.2418046 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:houspd:v:35:y:2025:i:1:p:118-123

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RHPD20

DOI: 10.1080/10511482.2024.2418046

Access Statistics for this article

Housing Policy Debate is currently edited by Tom Sanchez, Susanne Viscarra and Derek Hyra

More articles in Housing Policy Debate from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().