Non-response bias in gambling surveys

Robert M. Heirene, Deborah Cobb-Clark, Agnieszka Tymula, Teejay Santos and Sally M. Gainsbury

International Gambling Studies, 2025, vol. 25, issue 3, 448-471

Abstract: The representativeness of study samples is a perennial concern in survey research. Here we examined how gambling survey responders differed from non-responders. Australian customers of an electronic gaming machine venue (Study 1; n = 4,301) and two online wagering sites (Study 2; n = 24,829) were invited to participate in a survey about their gambling. We accessed account data for all invitees and compared responders’ and non-responders’ characteristics and gambling behaviors. In Study 1, differences between the 183 responders (4.25%) and non-responders were minimal (d = −0.23 to 0.21). In Study 2, the 1,956 responders (7.88%) were older, gambled more frequently and more recently (d = −0.51–0.58), and were more likely to be flagged by the site’s risk detection system (OR = 1.91). Subsample analyses restricted to those who had gambled in the past 30 days (n = 12,799) found smaller differences (d = −0.35–0.31, OR = 1.34), demonstrating how eligibility criteria affect sample representativeness. The ability to predict survey uptake via logistic regression models was poor in Studies 1 (Nagelkerke’s R2 = 4.6%) and 2 (8.5%). While gambling survey samples are broadly representative, responders – particularly in online studies – tend to be more involved in gambling, highlighting the need for caution when generalizing findings.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14459795.2025.2530106 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:intgms:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:448-471

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RIGS20

DOI: 10.1080/14459795.2025.2530106

Access Statistics for this article

International Gambling Studies is currently edited by Katie Donnelly, David Marshall, Bronwyn Stuart, Alex Blaszczynski and Jan McMillen

More articles in International Gambling Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().