 THE ONTOLOGICAL POLITICS OF ‘CLOSING THE GAPS’Tim Rowse Journal of Cultural Economy, 2009, vol. 2, issue 1-2, 33-48 Abstract: In Australia and New Zealand, the realization of the knowledge object ‘national population’ makes it necessary to involve Indigenous Australians and Māori in the Census. Both Indigenous peoples have engaged in the Census and have made use of the resulting official statistics in their self-representation as peoples not yet accorded social justice. This paper considers two of the issues of representing Indigenous peoples as populations: where to draw the distinction that makes the non-Indigenous/Indigenous population binary; and how to prevent the quantitative representation (‘population’) from subverting the qualitative representation (‘people’). That ‘population’ might trump ‘people’ is arguably an effect of the nation-state being a kind of ‘method assemblage’ in which people are arrayed as social entities that are knowable in certain terms. Drawing on the terms of recent liberal political theory, the paper poses the question of the ‘civicity’ of Indigenous Australians and Māori, concluding that there are ways that Indigenous intellectuals might use population data to substantiate their claims to people-hood. Date: 2009 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jculte:v:2:y:2009:i:1-2:p:33-48 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/17530350903063917 Access Statistics for this article Journal of Cultural Economy is currently edited by Michael Pryke, Joe Deville, Tony Bennett, Liz McFall and Melinda Cooper More articles in Journal of Cultural Economy from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.