Why Don't 'the Poor' Make Common Cause? The Importance of Subgroups
Anirudh Krishna
Journal of Development Studies, 2009, vol. 45, issue 6, 947-965
Abstract:
Analyses that regard 'the poor' as a sociological category need to take account of recent studies quantifying the extent of flux within these ranks. Frequent movements into and out of poverty regularly refresh the pool of the poor. Large numbers of poor people were not born poor: they have descended into poverty, some quite recently. Concurrently, many formerly poor people have escaped from poverty. Distinct subgroups are defined by these divergent trajectories. Members of different subgroups have diverse economic needs, political interests and mobilisation potential, making cohesive action as a political force unlikely (and certainly uncertain) among all of 'the poor'. Policies to assist poor people will be more effective, and political analysis will yield more fruitful results, if instead of working with any generic category of 'the poor' heed is taken of subgroup-specific experiences and demands.
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220380902807379 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:45:y:2009:i:6:p:947-965
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/FJDS20
DOI: 10.1080/00220380902807379
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Development Studies is currently edited by Howard White, Oliver Morrissey and Ken Shadlen
More articles in Journal of Development Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().