High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations: Re-investigating the Evidence from Bangladesh
Maren Duvendack and
Journal of Development Studies, 2012, vol. 48, issue 12, 1864-1880
Recently, microfinance has come under increasing criticism raising questions of the validity of iconic studies which have justified it, such as Pitt and Khandker. Chemin applied propensity score matching to the Pitt and Khandker data, finding different impacts, but does not disaggregate by gender of borrower. We first replicate Chemin and extend his analysis in two ways. We test the robustness of propensity score matching results to selection on unobservables using sensitivity analysis, and we investigate propensity score matching estimates of impacts by gender of borrowers. The mainly insignificant impacts of microfinance differ greatly by gender of borrower, but are all vulnerable to selection on unobservables. We are therefore not convinced that the relationships between microfinance and outcomes are causal with these data.
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (15) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: High Noon for Microfinance Impact Evaluations: Re-investigating the Evidence from Bangladesh (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:48:y:2012:i:12:p:1864-1880
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Development Studies is currently edited by Howard White, Oliver Morrissey and Ken Shadlen
More articles in Journal of Development Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().