Revisiting Haavelmo's structural econometrics: bridging the gap between theory and data
Aris Spanos ()
Journal of Economic Methodology, 2015, vol. 22, issue 2, 171-196
The objective of the paper is threefold. First, to argue that some of Haavelmo's (1944) methodological ideas and insights have been neglected because they are largely at odds with the traditional perspective that views empirical modeling in economics as an exercise in curve-fitting. Second, to make a case that this neglect has contributed to the unreliability of empirical evidence in economics that is largely due to statistical misspecification. The latter affects the reliability of inference by inducing discrepancies between the actual and nominal error probabilities. Third , to argue that the 'bridge pier' between theory and data, as envisaged by Haavelmo, T (1944) [The Probability Approach to Econometrics, Econometrica, 12 (supplement), 1-115], can be completed by blending some of his key methodological ideas and insights into a refined/extended version of the frequentist approach to inference. This new perspective is used to revisit dynamic stochastic general equilibrium modeling in an attempt to bring out the perspicacity and current relevance of some of Haavelmo's neglected ideas.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:22:y:2015:i:2:p:171-196
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands
More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().