Representation theorems and the semantics of decision-theoretic concepts

Mikaël Cozic and Brian Hill ()

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2015, vol. 22, issue 3, 292-311

Abstract: Contemporary decision theory places crucial emphasis on a family of mathematical results called representation theorems, which relate criteria for evaluating the available options (such as the expected utility criterion) to axioms pertaining to the decision-maker's preferences (for example, the transitivity axiom). Various claims have been made concerning the reasons for the importance of these results. The goal of this article is to assess their semantic role: representation theorems are purported to provide definitions of the decision-theoretic concepts involved in the evaluation criteria (such as those of utility or subjective probability that feature in the subjective expected utility criterion). In particular, this claim shall be examined from the perspective of philosophical theories of the meaning of theoretical terms.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1071503 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:22:y:2015:i:3:p:292-311

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20

DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2015.1071503

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().