Experimenting with the Coase theorem

Ramzi Mabsout and Hossein Radmard

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2020, vol. 27, issue 1, 1-17

Abstract: Kahneman, Knetsch, and Thaler's [(1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348] experiment on the Coase theorem disrupted a string of experimental successes in the 1980s. The source of their refutation is the endowment effect which generates a reluctance to trade. We use Steven Medema's recent benchmark interpretation of the Coase theorem to subject their experiment to methodological scrutiny, generating four distinct explanations of their findings. We find that their explanation is the only one at odds with the theorem. While Kahneman, Knetsch, & Thaler argued that they undermined the Coase theorem, their result is constrained by the exclusion of the rationality assumption and the adoption of the invariance-efficiency criterion. There is no immaculate Coase theorem and therefore no single experimental test that can falsify it. Instead, different experiments test specific deviations from a benchmark theorem.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1608457 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:1-17

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20

DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1608457

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().