Restoring constitution: saving performativity from Mäki’s critique

Mickey Peled

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2020, vol. 27, issue 1, 51-65

Abstract: This paper aims to solve a fundamental critique of the research project of the performativity of economics. The critique by philosopher Uskali Mäki strikes the concept of performativity in a weak spot – its utilization of the notion of constitution, drawn from John Austin’s philosophy of language. Accepting Mäki’s critique implies a deterioration of performativity to a marginal field in economics studies, the opposite of the substantial stance it enjoys today. Using Brian Epstein’s unique account of constitution’s role in the ontology of social groups, this paper suggests an original solution to the critique that restores the legitimacy and importance of using constitution as part of performativity research. Furthermore, it offers a novel ontologically nuanced definition of performativity.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1639787 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:51-65

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20

DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2019.1639787

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().