Economic methodology: a bibliometric perspective
Alexandre Truc,
François Claveau and
Olivier Santerre
Journal of Economic Methodology, 2021, vol. 28, issue 1, 67-78
Abstract:
Using tools from social network analysis, we study citation patterns since the early 1990s in the two most important journals in economic methodology (aka philosophy of economics). We mostly focus on assessing four historical claims in the existing interpretive literature. In agreement with the literature, we find that (1) it is sensible to split the field along three dimensions (corresponding to action theory, ethics and philosophy of science) and that (2) the interest for general philosophical questions (known as Big M) has steadily declined. Contra the literature, we find that (3) there is no move away from heterodox economics in the main journals: no significant interest was present to begin with. Finally, we update the literature regarding an alleged move toward the study of mainstream pluralism: (4) although this direction describes well the early 2000s, the field in the 2010s is better characterized as mainly fascinated by behavioral economics.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868774 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:28:y:2021:i:1:p:67-78
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20
DOI: 10.1080/1350178X.2020.1868774
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands
More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().