EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The rhetoric of Friedman's quantity theory manifesto

Thomas Mayer

Journal of Economic Methodology, 1997, vol. 4, issue 2, 199-220

Abstract: Friedman's 1956 essay, 'The Quantity Theory of Money: A Restatement', in his Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money should be read in the context of the prevailing Keynesian consensus of the time. His primary task had to be to convince economists to reconsider this theory. This required an ecumenical presentation that would not drive off potential readers. At the same time it required making some strong claims for the quantity theory to induce readers to reconsider it. A combination of 'sweet reason' and shock tactics was needed. Friedman accomplished this rhetorical task brilliantly.

Keywords: Friedman; quantity theory; monetarism; rhetoric (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13501789700000015 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: THE RHETORIC OF FRIEDMAN'S QUANTITY THEORY MANIFESTO (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: THE RHETORIC OF FRIEDMAN'S QUANTITY THEORY MANIFESTO Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:4:y:1997:i:2:p:199-220

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20

DOI: 10.1080/13501789700000015

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:4:y:1997:i:2:p:199-220