Should we abandon optimization theory? The need for bounded rationality

Frederic Laville

Journal of Economic Methodology, 2001, vol. 7, issue 3, 395-426

Abstract: This paper makes explicit the rhetoric of optimization. Various arguments are examined, in order to determine whether we should retain optimization theory or assume bounded rationality. Empirical evidence confounds optimization theory; in the face of experimental studies, an empirical dilemma emerges, according to which we should discard either the theory of expected utility or the criterion of empirical refutation. Methodological criticisms attack optimization theory's epistemological status; together, they give rise to a methodological trilemma, according to which optimization theory is indeterminate, unfalsifiable or tautological. Methodological defences seem to protect optimization theory against criticism; but a more careful examination shows that either they involve logical defects or they rest upon a conceptual gap. Theoretical difficulties plague optimization theory; though various extensions have been proposed, optimization theory entails a theoretical dilemma, according to which one must choose between unrealistic environment and unrealistic abilities. Should we abandon optimization theory? The leading question will be answered in the affirmative: optimization theory should be abandoned and bounded rationality should be assumed.

Keywords: Optimization Theory; Bounded Rationality; Methodololgy; Rhetoric; Experimental; Criticism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/135017800453751 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jecmet:v:7:y:2001:i:3:p:395-426

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJEC20

DOI: 10.1080/135017800453751

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Methodology is currently edited by John Davis and D Wade Hands

More articles in Journal of Economic Methodology from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().