Microeconomics and Psychology

Steven Beckman, Lanxin Chen, Greg DeAngelo, W. James Smith and Xieting Zhang

The Journal of Economic Education, 2011, vol. 42, issue 3, 255-269

Abstract: Psychologists such as the Nobel Prize--winner Daniel Kahneman challenge the major assumptions of microeconomics: the rational pursuit of self-interest given unchanging tastes. One may explore these issues through a questionnaire that may be distributed in class. How many of your students behave as the psychologists predict? Should economists adapt their theories of the market to reflect their findings? Prospect theory, changes in reference points, fairness, framing effects, loss aversion, the ultimatum game, herding, context dependence, the dictator game, preference reversals and the structure of the human brain are all illustrated through simple questions. The body of this article connects the questions to the literature and introduces the debates between economists and psychologists.

Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2011.581943 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:42:y:2011:i:3:p:255-269

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/VECE20

DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2011.581943

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Economic Education is currently edited by William Walstad

More articles in The Journal of Economic Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().