The Impact of Assessment Policy on Learning: Replacement Exams or Grade Dropping

Raymond J. MacDermott

The Journal of Economic Education, 2013, vol. 44, issue 4, 364-371

Abstract: Instructors often debate the merits of alternate grading policies such as dropping the lowest exam or offering an additional exam to replace the lowest score. To date, there has been little research conducted on the impact of these policies on performance. In this study, the author investigates student performance in intermediate macroeconomics over three semesters at a small Eastern college. In each semester, a different assessment policy was applied: Count all three in-term exams; drop the lowest of three exams; offer an additional exam to replace the lowest in-term exam score. Contrary to previous research and conventional wisdom, the author finds that allowing students to drop their lowest grade improved performance on a cumulative final exam, while offering a replacement test had no significant effects.

Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220485.2013.825114 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jeduce:v:44:y:2013:i:4:p:364-371

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/VECE20

DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2013.825114

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Economic Education is currently edited by William Walstad

More articles in The Journal of Economic Education from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().