Preferences for alternative risk management policies at the United States major nuclear weapons legacy sites
Michael Greenberg,
Karen Lowrie,
Joanna Burger,
Charles Powers,
Michael Gochfeld and
Henry Mayer
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2007, vol. 50, issue 2, 187-209
Abstract:
A survey of 1351 people who lived within 50 miles of one of six US Department of Energy nuclear weapon sites showed that the vast majority of residents prefer strong public health surveillance and land use controls. The sample was stratified so that the same number of responses was obtained at each site. The strongest correlates of wanting the DOE to restrict on-site activities and maintain and expand its surveillance programs were worries about DOE activities on the site, as well as how those activities could damage the off-site environment. Notably, the exceptions, that is, those who demanded less from the DOE and were not particularly worried about the DOE's activities, tended to live near the site, many worked there or knew people who did, and had high socio-economic status, and trusted the DOE. The findings are mostly, but not entirely, consistent with expectations drawn from the risk perception and organizational trust literatures. The challenge is how to establish a stewardship program that represents a consensus among state and local government, community advisory boards and the public that remediation can go on at the same time that some waste is managed on-site until suitable technologies can be safely deployed, which at some sites means 100 years or in perpetuity.
Date: 2007
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560601156441 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:50:y:2007:i:2:p:187-209
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CJEP20
DOI: 10.1080/09640560601156441
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management is currently edited by Dr Neil Powe, Dr Ken Willis and George Bill Page
More articles in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().