Better than their reputation: enhancing the validity of contingent valuation mail survey results through citizen expert groups
Michael Ahlheim,
Benchaphun Ekasingh,
Oliver Fror,
Jirawan Kitchaicharoen,
Andreas Neef,
Chapika Sangkapitux and
Nopasom Sinphurmsukskul
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2010, vol. 53, issue 2, 163-182
Abstract:
Although contingent valuation is the dominant technique for the valuation of public projects, especially in the environmental sector, the high costs of contingent valuation surveys prevent the use of this method for the assessment of relatively small projects. The reason for this cost problem is that typically only contingent valuation studies which are based on face-to-face interviews are accepted as leading to valid results. Particularly in countries with high wages, face-to-face surveys are extremely costly considering that for a valid contingent valuation study a minimum of 1000 completed face-to-face interviews is required. This paper tries a rehabilitation of mail surveys as low-budget substitutes for costly face-to-face surveys. Based on an empirical contingent valuation study in Northern Thailand, it is shown that the validity of mail surveys can be improved significantly if so-called Citizen Expert Groups are employed for a thorough survey design.
Keywords: contingent valuation; mail surveys; citizen expert groups; willingness to pay; Thailand; convergent validity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09640560903529196 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:53:y:2010:i:2:p:163-182
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CJEP20
DOI: 10.1080/09640560903529196
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management is currently edited by Dr Neil Powe, Dr Ken Willis and George Bill Page
More articles in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().