Robust rules for industrial policy open economies
Dermot Leahy () and
J. Peter Neary ()
The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2001, vol. 10, issue 4, 393-409
The theory of strategic trade policy yields ambiguous recommendations for assistance to exporting firms in oligopolistic industries. However, some writers have suggested that investment subsidies are a more robust recommendation than export subsidies. We show that, although ambiguous in principle, the case for investment subsidies is reasonably robust in practice. Except when functional forms exhibit arbitrary nonlinearities, it holds under both Cournot and Bertrand competition, with either costreducing or market-expanding investment, and with or without spillovers. Only if firms have strong asymmetries in their investment behaviour and engage in Bertrand competition is an investment tax clearly justified.
Keywords: Cost-REDUCING Investment; Export Subsidies; Market-EXPANDING Investment; R+D Subsidies; Strategic Industrial Policy; Strategic Trade Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jitecd:v:10:y:2001:i:4:p:393-409
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development is currently edited by Professor Pasquale Sgro
More articles in The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().