Constrained Regression for Interval-Valued Data

Gloria Gonzalez-Rivera and Wei Lin

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2013, vol. 31, issue 4, 473-490

Abstract: Current regression models for interval-valued data do not guarantee that the predicted lower bound of the interval is always smaller than its upper bound. We propose a constrained regression model that preserves the natural order of the interval in all instances, either for in-sample fitted intervals or for interval forecasts. Within the framework of interval time series, we specify a general dynamic bivariate system for the upper and lower bounds of the intervals. By imposing the order of the interval bounds into the model, the bivariate probability density function of the errors becomes conditionally truncated. In this context, the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators of the parameters of the system are inconsistent. Estimation by maximum likelihood is possible but it is computationally burdensome due to the nonlinearity of the estimator when there is truncation. We propose a two-step procedure that combines maximum likelihood and least squares estimation and a modified two-step procedure that combines maximum likelihood and minimum-distance estimation. In both instances, the estimators are consistent. However, when multicollinearity arises in the second step of the estimation, the modified two-step procedure is superior at identifying the model regardless of the severity of the truncation. Monte Carlo simulations show good finite sample properties of the proposed estimators. A comparison with the current methods in the literature shows that our proposed methods are superior by delivering smaller losses and better estimators (no bias and low mean squared errors) than those from competing approaches. We illustrate our approach with the daily interval of low/high SP500 returns and find that truncation is very severe during and after the financial crisis of 2008, so OLS estimates should not be trusted and a modified two-step procedure should be implemented. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (32)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07350015.2013.818004 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:31:y:2013:i:4:p:473-490

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UBES20

DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2013.818004

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Eric Sampson, Rong Chen and Shakeeb Khan

More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().