Ambiguity in the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: An Empirical Assessment
Julian Thimme and
Clemens Völkert
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2015, vol. 33, issue 3, 418-429
Abstract:
This article estimates and tests the smooth ambiguity model of Klibanoff, Marinacci, and Mukerji based on stock market data. We introduce a novel methodology to estimate the conditional expectation, which characterizes the impact of a decision maker's ambiguity attitude on asset prices. Our point estimates of the ambiguity parameter are between 25 and 60, whereas our risk aversion estimates are considerably lower. The substantial difference indicates that market participants are ambiguity averse. Furthermore, we evaluate if ambiguity aversion helps explaining the cross-section of expected returns. Compared with Epstein and Zin preferences, we find that incorporating ambiguity into the decision model improves the fit to the data while keeping relative risk aversion at more reasonable levels. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07350015.2014.958230 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:33:y:2015:i:3:p:418-429
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UBES20
DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2014.958230
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Eric Sampson, Rong Chen and Shakeeb Khan
More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().