Earnings Dynamics and Measurement Error in Matched Survey and Administrative Data

Dean Hyslop and Wilbur Townsend

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2020, vol. 38, issue 2, 457-469

Abstract: This article analyzes earnings dynamics and measurement error using a matched longitudinal sample of individuals’ survey and administrative earnings. In line with previous literature, the reported differences are characterized by both persistent and transitory factors. Estimating a model consistent with past results, survey errors are mean-reverting when administrative reports are assumed correct, but not when this assumption is relaxed. Although most reported earnings variation is true, we conclude that measurement errors dominate observed changes, and that transitory earnings contribute little to overall earnings inequality. The results imply the reliability of matched administrative data should be treated with caution.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (12)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07350015.2018.1514308 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Earnings Dynamics and Measurement Error in Matched Survey and Administrative Data (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jnlbes:v:38:y:2020:i:2:p:457-469

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/UBES20

DOI: 10.1080/07350015.2018.1514308

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business & Economic Statistics is currently edited by Eric Sampson, Rong Chen and Shakeeb Khan

More articles in Journal of Business & Economic Statistics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().