Expert knowledge and social innovation: analysing policy debates in Japan

Stefano Ghinoi and Miki Omori

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2025, vol. 16, issue 2, 392-411

Abstract: Expert knowledge is considered fundamental in the policymaking process, especially when considering multidimensional phenomena such as social innovation. However, the positioning of experts in the policy debate still deserves a thorough investigation. By using Japan as case study and applying Discourse Network Analysis to the debates occurred in the Japanese National Diet (2017–2021), this study investigates the presence of discourse factions and the positioning of experts in these factions. Results show that factions exist but there is not a strong polarisation in the arena; moreover, experts do not just support neoliberal policies, they also encourage bottom-up initiatives.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19420676.2023.2178485 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:jsocen:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:392-411

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RJSE20

DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2023.2178485

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship is currently edited by Alex Nicholls

More articles in Journal of Social Entrepreneurship from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().