Estimation for u-shaped beta distributions: minimum hellinger distance and related methods

D. Richard Cutler and Adele Cutler

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2000, vol. 29, issue 7, 1487-1509

Abstract: We compare minimum Hellinger distance and minimum Heiiinger disparity estimates for U-shaped beta distributions. Given suitable density estimates, both methods are known to be asymptotically efficient when the data come from the assumed model family, and robust to small perturbations from the model family. Most implementations use kernel density estimates, which may not be appropriate for U-shaped distributions. We compare fixed binwidth histograms, percentile mesh histograms, and averaged shifted histograms. Minimum disparity estimates are less sensitive to the choice of density estimate than are minimum distance estimates, and the percentile mesh histogram gives the best results for both minimum distance and minimum disparity estimates. Minimum distance estimates are biased and a bias-corrected method is proposed. Minimum disparity estimates and bias-corrected minimum distance estimates are comparable to maximum likelihood estimates when the model holds, and give better results than either method of moments or maximum likelihood when the data are discretized or contaminated, Although our re¬sults are for the beta density, the implementations are easily modified for other U-shaped distributions such as the Dirkhlet or normal generated distribution.

Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610920008832558 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:29:y:2000:i:7:p:1487-1509

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610920008832558

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().