EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Ranking in the generalized Bradley–Terry models when the strong connection condition fails

Ting Yan

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2016, vol. 45, issue 2, 340-353

Abstract: For non balanced paired comparisons, a wide variety of ranking methods have been proposed. One of the best popular methods is the Bradley–Terry model in which the ranking of a set of objects is decided by the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of merits parameters. However, the existence of MLE for the Bradley–Terry model and its generalized models to allow for tied observation or home-field advantage or both to occur, crucially depends on the strong connection condition on the directed graph constructed by a win–loss matrix. When this condition fails, the MLE does not exist and hence there is no solution of ranking. In this paper, we propose an improved version of the ϵ singular perturbation proposed by Conner and Grant (2000), to address this problem and to extend it to the generalized Bradley–Terry models. Some necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the penalized MLEs for these generalized Bradley–Terry-ϵ models are derived. Numerical studies show that the ranking is robust to the different ϵ. We apply the proposed methods to the data of the 2008 NFL regular season.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2013.809114 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:2:p:340-353

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2013.809114

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:45:y:2016:i:2:p:340-353