EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of spline estimator at various levels of autocorrelation in smoothing spline non parametric regression for longitudinal data

Adji Achmad Rinaldo Fernandes, Paul Janssen, Umu Sa'adah, Solimun, Achmad Effendi, Nurjannah and Luthfatul Amaliana

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2018, vol. 47, issue 21, 5265-5285

Abstract: The purpose of this research are: (1) to obtain spline function estimation in non parametric regression for longitudinal data with and without considering the autocorrelation between data of observation within subject, (2) to develop the algorithm that generates simulation data with certain autocorrelation level based on size of sample (N) and error variance (EV), and (3) to establish shape of spline estimator in non parametric regression for longitudinal data to simulation with various level of autocorrelation, as well as compare DM and TM approaches in predicting spline estimator in the data simulation with different of autocorrelation observational data on within subject. The results of the application are as follows: (a) implementation of smoothing spline with penalized weighted least square (PWLS) approach with or without consideration of autocorrelation in general (in all sizes and all error variances levels) provides significantly different spline estimator when the autocorrelation level >0.8; (b) based on size comparison, spline estimator in non parametric regression smoothing spline with PLS approach with (DM), or without (DM) consideration of autocorrelation showed significantly different result in level of autocorrelation > 0.8 (in overall size, moderate and large sample size), and > 0.7 (in small sample size); (c) based on level of variance, spline estimator in non parametric regression smoothing spline with PLS approach with (DM), or without (DM) consideration of autocorrelation showed significantly different result in level of autocorrelation > 0.8 (in overall level of variance, moderate and large variance), and > 0.7 (in small variance).

Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2017.1388404 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:21:p:5265-5285

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2017.1388404

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:47:y:2018:i:21:p:5265-5285