EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Modelling ordinal assessments: fit is not sufficient

David Andrich and Pender Pedler

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2019, vol. 48, issue 12, 2932-2947

Abstract: Assessments in ordered categories are ubiquitous in the social sciences. These assessments are assigned ordinal counts and analyzed with probabilistic models. If the counts fit the model, it is assumed that no unaccounted for factors govern the distribution and that it is a random error distribution. However, because tests of fit utilize parameter estimates from the data, the data may fit the model even when the modeled distributions cannot be random error distributions. This paper applies the additional criterion of strict unimodality, common to all random error distributions, to decide if a modeled distribution is not a random error distribution. However, not only are common random error distributions strictly unimodal, they are also strictly log-concave, a stronger form of unimodality which ensures smooth transitions between probabilities of adjacent counts. The paper shows that the operation for determining the strict unimodality also ensures that the distribution is locally strictly log-concave around the measure of the entity of assessment.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2018.1473595 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:48:y:2019:i:12:p:2932-2947

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2018.1473595

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:48:y:2019:i:12:p:2932-2947