EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A revisit to Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic for comparing two predictive values

Yougui Wu

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2022, vol. 51, issue 10, 3419-3433

Abstract: Bennett (Statistics in Medicine 4 (1985), 535-539) proposed a goodness-of-fit statistic to compare two predictive values in an attempt to improve upon its earlier version he derived in 1976. However, this new version of Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic was not presented correctly, and more importantly, its validity has been questioned by several authors in the literature as it did not involve the disease prevalence, a part of the two Predictive Values to be compared. To shed some light on this classical test statistic, in this paper, we first obtain the corrected version of Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic. We then compare the corrected version with its recent Wald counterpart proposed by Wang (Statistics in Medicine 25(2006), 2215-2229) and show that the two statistics are asymptotically equivalent. The validity of the corrected Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic is further supported by a simulation study which indicates that Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic with correction has similar finite sample performance to its Wald counterpart. In conclusion, the corrected Bennett’s goodness-of-fit statistic is a competitive statistic for testing equality of two predictive values.

Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.1982987 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:10:p:3419-3433

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.1982987

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:51:y:2022:i:10:p:3419-3433