EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Medical diagnostics accuracy measures and cut-point selection: an innovative approach based on relative net benefit

Hani Samawi, Ding-Geng Chen, Ferdous Ahmed and Jing Kersey

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2023, vol. 52, issue 14, 5010-5025

Abstract: The evaluation of diagnostics tests based on net benefit involves both the accuracy of the tests and the clinical consequences of the diagnostic errors. Also, the benefit-risk measures approach depends on the prevalence of the underlying disease. However, for some diseases or clinical conditions, the prevalence is either unknown or different from region to region or population to population, resulting in an erroneous diagnosis. This paper introduces innovative post-test diagnostic accuracy measures and a new cut-point selection criterion based on the expected relative net benefit. Our approach does not depend on the disease’s prevalence, maximizing net benefit and reducing the clinical consequences of the diagnostic errors. We demonstrate the advantages of the proposed measures to compare different diagnostic tests and/or biomarkers, on average, the abilities for rule-in, rule-out clinical condition, and as cut-point selection criterion that maximize the expected relative net benefit diagnostic accuracy. Numerical examples, simulation studies, and real data are provided to illustrate the superiority and applicability of the proposed measures.

Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03610926.2021.2001016 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:14:p:5010-5025

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/lsta20

DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2021.2001016

Access Statistics for this article

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods is currently edited by Debbie Iscoe

More articles in Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:lstaxx:v:52:y:2023:i:14:p:5010-5025