EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Maritime policy development against ship flagging out dilemma using a fuzzy quantified SWOT analysis

Metin Celik and Ahmet Kandakoglu

Maritime Policy & Management, 2012, vol. 39, issue 4, 401-421

Abstract: The increasing trends of registered shipping tonnage with open registries have influenced the reputation of national registries especially in traditional maritime countries. Hence, the economic and political consequences of the flagging out dilemma have prompted the maritime administrations to seek for an effective strategy plan with a long-term perspective. This study proposed a fuzzy quantified Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis on the case of the flagging out problem in the Turkish maritime industry. Consequently, the originally proposed ‘flagging out strategy development and evaluation matrix’ (FODEM) has the potential to enable a consistent decision aid to international maritime authorities regarding the counteracting of flagging out dilemma.

Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2012.689876 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:401-421

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/TMPM20

DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2012.689876

Access Statistics for this article

Maritime Policy & Management is currently edited by Dr Kevin Li and Heather Leggate McLaughlin

More articles in Maritime Policy & Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:39:y:2012:i:4:p:401-421