A game theory analysis of China’s maritime cross-border insolvency policy: from the perspective of Hanjin shipping’s bankruptcy case

Zhu Li and Bingying Dong

Maritime Policy & Management, 2021, vol. 48, issue 3, 419-431

Abstract: Financial difficulties experienced within the shipping industry have caused an increasing number of maritime cross-border insolvencies. The UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the Model Law) is designed to assist countries in equipping their insolvency laws with a modern framework that more effectively addresses cross-border insolvency proceedings. This paper discusses whether China should adopt the Model Law, using the method of strategic game theory based on the Hanjin Bankruptcy case. Our results show that, from the perspective of a mathematical evaluation, China should not adopt the Model Law, since Hanjin declared bankruptcy with South Korea’s adoption already having taken place. Even if the Model Law is adopted, its application in China will be very limited due to the structure of Chinese shipping enterprises.

Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03088839.2020.1779366 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:marpmg:v:48:y:2021:i:3:p:419-431

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/TMPM20

DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2020.1779366

Access Statistics for this article

Maritime Policy & Management is currently edited by Dr Kevin Li and Heather Leggate McLaughlin

More articles in Maritime Policy & Management from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().