Firm-specific news and idiosyncratic volatility anomalies: Evidence from the Chinese stock market
Hai Hoang ()
Cogent Economics & Finance, 2022, vol. 10, issue 1, 2127489
Abstract:
In this paper, we examine the relationship between idiosyncratic volatility and future returns around the firm-specific news announcements in the Chinese stock market following. The results show that the pricing of non-news idiosyncratic volatility is more strongly negative compared to news idiosyncratic volatility. Such findings imply that limited arbitrage cannot fully explain the negative pricing of idiosyncratic volatility in the Chinese stock market. These results are robust after controlling for several well-known variables, such as market beta, firm size, book-to-market, momentum, liquidity, and maximum return. However, after adjusting by additional macroeconomic variables, the Chinese four-factor model and the salience trading volume factor, the average returns on zero-investment IVOL and non-news IVOL portfolios turn out to be insignificant, indicating that they may be one driver of the IVOL puzzle in the Chinese stock market.
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2022.2127489 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:10:y:2022:i:1:p:2127489
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/OAEF20
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2022.2127489
Access Statistics for this article
Cogent Economics & Finance is currently edited by Steve Cook, Caroline Elliott, David McMillan, Duncan Watson and Xibin Zhang
More articles in Cogent Economics & Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().