Perception of negative earnings persistence and value relevance: Evidence from Zimbabwe
Atanas Sixpence and
Olufemi Patrick Adeyeye
Cogent Economics & Finance, 2018, vol. 6, issue 1, 1559711
Abstract:
This paper investigates the impact of negative earnings persistence on the value relevance of earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) and book values for 27 non-financial firms listed on the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (ZSE). Negative earnings are perceived to be persistent where firms reported losses in at least 25% of the time over the eight-year study period. Two-step System GMM was used, with the average debt-equity ratio and net asset value per share being additional regression instruments. The regressions were primarily done on the ZSE full sample, and then on a profit-reporting firms’ sample. The loss-reporting firms’ sample was too small for meaningful regressions. It was found that when loss-firms were removed from the sample, value relevance of EBIT and book value declined. This means that investors are very meticulous with firms they perceive to be persistent loss-makers but tend to be complacent with profit-firms.
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23322039.2018.1559711 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:oaefxx:v:6:y:2018:i:1:p:1559711
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/OAEF20
DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2018.1559711
Access Statistics for this article
Cogent Economics & Finance is currently edited by Steve Cook, Caroline Elliott, David McMillan, Duncan Watson and Xibin Zhang
More articles in Cogent Economics & Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().