 Complex Emergencies versus Natural Disasters: An Analytical Comparison of Causes and EffectsOxford Development Studies, 2000, vol. 28, issue 2, 187-204 Abstract: This paper compares complex humanitarian emergencies with natural disasters. The key feature of a complex emergency is the societal/institutional weakness that fails to accommodate competing identity groups, while the key characteristic of a natural disaster is the physical weakness of structures and processes that fail to compensate for extreme natural events. The main difference between complex emergencies and natural disasters is the degree of societal endogeneity of causes and effects, the former being fully endogenous, the latter being only partially so. A subordinated difference between them is the way in which the key concepts of vulnerability, proneness and the unleashing event relate to one another. In natural disasters these three concepts are mostly constant and can normally be analysed with a good deal of independence from each other, while in complex emergencies they exhibit a strong interdependency and derived variability. Finally, in complex emergencies most effects are deliberately institutional, while in natural disasters most effects are random and the institutional ones are mostly incidental and not normally important. Date: 2000 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:28:y:2000:i:2:p:187-204 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1080/713688308 Access Statistics for this article Oxford Development Studies is currently edited by Jo Boyce and Frances Stewart More articles in Oxford Development Studies from Taylor & Francis Journals |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.