A comparison of biased simulation schemes for stochastic volatility models
Remmert Koekkoek and
Dick van Dijk ()
Quantitative Finance, 2010, vol. 10, issue 2, 177-194
Using an Euler discretization to simulate a mean-reverting CEV process gives rise to the problem that while the process itself is guaranteed to be nonnegative, the discretization is not. Although an exact and efficient simulation algorithm exists for this process, at present this is not the case for the CEV-SV stochastic volatility model, with the Heston model as a special case, where the variance is modelled as a mean-reverting CEV process. Consequently, when using an Euler discretization, one must carefully think about how to fix negative variances. Our contribution is threefold. Firstly, we unify all Euler fixes into a single general framework. Secondly, we introduce the new full truncation scheme, tailored to minimize the positive bias found when pricing European options. Thirdly and finally, we numerically compare all Euler fixes to recent quasi-second order schemes of Kahl and Jackel, and Ninomiya and Victoir, as well as to the exact scheme of Broadie and Kaya. The choice of fix is found to be extremely important. The full truncation scheme outperforms all considered biased schemes in terms of bias and root-mean-squared error.
Keywords: Stochastic volatility; Heston; Square root process; CEV process; Euler-Maruyama; Discretization; Strong convergence; Weak convergence; Boundary behaviour (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (60) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Working Paper: A Comparison of Biased Simulation Schemes for Stochastic Volatility Models (2007)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:10:y:2010:i:2:p:177-194
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
Quantitative Finance is currently edited by Michael Dempster and Jim Gatheral
More articles in Quantitative Finance from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().